TokenPilot Benchmarks
TokenPilot is evaluated on two benchmarks: PinchBench and Claw-Eval. Both measure agent task success and token efficiency.
Evaluation Setup
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Model | GPT-5.4-mini (OpenClaw) |
| Pricing | $1.10/M input, $4.40/M cached input, $8.80/M output |
| Modes | Isolated (fresh session per task) and Continuous (shared session) |
| TokenPilot mode | Normal |
Isolated vs. Continuous
- Isolated: Each task runs in a fresh session. No cross-task context accumulation. Tests single-task behavior.
- Continuous: Tasks run in a shared session. Context accumulates across tasks. Tests TokenPilot's ability to manage growing context.
TokenPilot's benefits are most visible in continuous mode, where context accumulation and cache reuse matter most.
PinchBench
PinchBench measures performance across 11 task categories: Productivity, Research, Writing, Coding, Analysis, CSV Analysis, Log Analysis, Meeting Analysis, Memory, Skills, and Integrations.
Continuous Mode (where TokenPilot excels)
| Method | Overall Score | Cache Read (M) | Cache Miss (M) | Output (M) | Cost ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanilla | 79.2 | 25.015 | 5.943 | 0.202 | 7.24 |
| LLMLingua-2 | 73.8 | 20.574 | 2.183 | 0.194 | 4.06 |
| SelectiveContext | 74.0 | 25.475 | 2.608 | 0.196 | 4.75 |
| LCM | 77.0 | 18.708 | 2.417 | 0.222 | 4.21 |
| Keep-Last-N | 79.1 | 18.117 | 4.481 | 0.209 | 5.66 |
| MemOS | 80.9 | 30.859 | 8.939 | 0.308 | 10.41 |
| TokenPilot | 81.3 | 8.551 | 1.549 | 0.219 | 2.79 |
TokenPilot achieves:
- 67.4% fewer input tokens vs. Vanilla (cache miss: 1.549M vs. 5.943M)
- 61.5% lower cost vs. Vanilla ($2.79 vs. $7.24)
- Best overall score (81.3)
- Lowest cache miss and best cache reuse
Isolated Mode
| Method | Overall Score | Cache Read (M) | Cache Miss (M) | Output (M) | Cost ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanilla | 80.5 | 6.184 | 8.753 | 0.285 | 8.31 |
| MemoBrain | 78.1 | 10.200 | 2.107 | 0.233 | 3.36 |
| TokenPilot | 81.0 | 8.893 | 1.933 | 0.244 | 3.22 |
Even in isolated mode, TokenPilot achieves the best overall score and lowest cost.
Claw-Eval
Claw-Eval measures performance across 12 task categories: Workflow, Operations, Finance, Office QA, Communication, Productivity, Operations, Safety, Terminal, Multimodal, and Others.
Continuous Mode
| Method | Overall Score | Cache Read (M) | Cache Miss (M) | Output (M) | Cost ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanilla | 63.4 | 709.845 | 21.981 | 2.622 | 81.52 |
| MemoBrain | 57.9 | 47.497 | 13.990 | 1.134 | 19.16 |
| AgentSwing | 62.2 | 53.776 | 10.027 | 0.907 | 15.63 |
| TokenPilot | 60.8 | 21.430 | 9.928 | 0.338 | 10.58 |
TokenPilot achieves:
- 95.7% fewer input tokens vs. Vanilla (cache miss: 9.928M vs. 21.981M)
- 87.0% lower cost vs. Vanilla ($10.58 vs. $81.52)
- Massive cache read reduction (21.43M vs. 709.85M — 97% reduction)
Isolated Mode
| Method | Overall Score | Cache Read (M) | Cache Miss (M) | Output (M) | Cost ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanilla | 64.5 | 9.429 | 4.637 | 0.216 | 5.16 |
| TokenPilot | 63.1 | 4.436 | 1.154 | 0.239 | 2.27 |
TokenPilot achieves the lowest cache miss and lowest cost in isolated mode as well.
Key Takeaways
- Cache miss is dramatically lower: TokenPilot's stable prefix ensures consistent cache hits.
- Cost scales better: Vanilla cost grows with session length; TokenPilot cost stays flat.
- Quality is maintained: Task success is competitive or better across both benchmarks.
- Continuous is where it shines: The longer the session, the bigger TokenPilot's advantage.
Reproducing Results
See experiments/README.md in the repository for:
- Environment setup
- Data download links
- Runner commands
- Output directory structure